Calvin Klein Mens Cotton Multipack Briefs
-
The Norwood’s
> 3 dayFast delivery, fits good
-
AutumnRose
Greater than one weekMy husband has worn these CK black briefs for years and the last ones are finally giving out so I looked for a long time to find these. I can’t even remember when I bought his last packages at Costco, but they stopped carrying this style several YEARS ago and I haven’t been able to find them. He’s been wearing the same ones, but the knit edges are beginning to come loose from the elastic bands so it was time to get serious about replacing them (even so, the elastic bands are still in good shape!) I was so happy to find these for hubby cuz he hates all the new boxer briefs that fit like Speedos. However, after just a few short months, the elastic is rippling in the back seam of the waistband, so it won’t be long until it starts fraying. This used to be such a quality product: they must be using a different supplier of elastic, cuz the quality is just not what it used to be. and these newer ones cut into his leg, so the pattern must cut differently too. Too bad… it used to be a great product. not so much now.
-
John
> 3 dayGood product, a little bit expensive, but OK
-
Charles L. Johnson
Greater than one weekCalvin Klein underwear used to come in 2” size increments (36,38,40…). Now they’ve gone to 4” size increments (L=36-38, XL=40-42). I’m now in between sizes…L is too tight and XL is too loose. For almost $40 a four pack I’d think they could provide sizes in 2” increments.
-
The Rev.
> 3 dayTags were annoying, cut them off and didnt have issues with left-over snaggy pieces of the tags but just annoying to buy from a company like CK and have to hassle with that crap. Seems like it should be pretty damn obvious to any underwear/clothing company that is run by human beings who have ever worn clothes, or robots that have been programmed to listen to the most basic customer feedback... to just lose the damn tags. In the end, once the changes are put in place - I would think that a tagless brief would mean: 1. Use of less material. 2. Less stitching/less complicated production process. 3. Would provide an idea for something to mention in a stupid commercial or print ad when the advertiser bros cant think of anything to say about underwear. Those days where after sitting in the conference room for 6 hours, the only thing those bros you pay 6-figures have to show for their time is a marker board that says Underwear Brainstorming at the top and these points listed below: - Shoot in black and white, as always. But with 2 white models, as always. In a windy bedroom, as always. - Be original, as always. - Highly attractive young adult muscular man. - Man wears product (Underwear). - Female appears. Highly attractive, unhealthily-thin, seems significantly younger than product-wearing-man. - Female displays Über-lust-filled eyes showcasing the enchanting, borderline-illegal, seductive spell the underwear casts on her. *list would end here* - but not today, thanks to your genius decision to boldly remove the part of your product that nobody wants, instead... (now they can add something stupid to the brainstorm board about the tags finally being gone - like No-Tags-Attached lunch meeting or no shirt, no shoes, no tags - or any number of mind-numbingly stupid ways of bragging that you stopped doing something you never should have done in the first place) 4. Increased customer satisfaction. I guess just focus on number 4, might be reason enough to get rid of the tags. Balls in your court, CK... no pun intended
-
Ron
> 3 dayIve never thought to review underwear, but these Kleins are great. The fly is moot, I dont use it. These dont bag-out over the day. After work, I get myself to the gym. Most underwear after a long business day are bagged-out, waistbands either leave red rings from being too tight or are slipping down guys hips. These dont bag, dont strangle, and have a cut that looks fresh. Id rather look good in my underwear than all the guys I see in the locker room looking like theyve been living in theirs for days (plus). After tons of washings, they look the same. All Cotton and feel good, not too weighty in Summer, and just thought Id add my $0.02 as I looked for stuff deserving a review! This 4-pack, on Amazon, is a great price as well!
-
Donmec
> 3 dayIt was correct
-
Josh
> 3 dayThese are functional, soft, and generally pretty comfortable. However, given they come at a very premium price, I dont really think theyre any better than your standard underwear you can get at Walmart (or Amazon) for significantly cheaper. I can see why others are questioning if theyre knockoffs (they arent - I wondered this too and actually ordered a second pack directly from CK, and theyre exactly the same). They dont really look premium either - just basic briefs, which is fine, but not really worth the price. I also have no idea why they put FOUR labels on the back that you have to cut out - the remaining tag is annoying too. The waistbands feel very cheap and have a slight tendency to roll...theyre pretty narrow and they sit low enough that this usually isnt a big issue, but its noticeable. Fit is as expected, though. Overall, theyre fine but just not worth the price.
-
Marksofd
> 3 dayWhat can you say? It’s Calvin Klein. It’s got to be good. My butt isn’t big by any means but I’d like the feeling of it being completely covered up. This classic brief does it perfectly. I have a few pairs of other styles and other brands but this is my gold standard. Unless your hormones are absolutely surging it should be yours too.
-
Shirley Cashio
Greater than one weekneed larger size